Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joe Yetter's avatar

A change of regime in Tehran would be laudable. As you point out, Persia has contributed mightily to the advance of civilization. The young and urban Iranians are generally smart, educated, and favor democracy and progress; they know that Britain and America thwarted the democracy and progress their parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents achieved 75 years ago: we stole their futures. So they might not fully appreciate our efforts to bomb them into submission. Bombing civilians generally hardens resolve, as has been demonstrated repeatedly, in Britain, Germany, Vietnam, France, Russia, etc. (We can all think of an exception.)

Netanyahu has actually been relatively selective in this campaign, and has gone out of his way to assure Iranians that Israel has no beef with them, only the regime and weapons. Trump, I think, does not care a bit about any lives other than his own (and Ivanka's). He'll drop those MOPs soon, I think. Regime change may be a consequence; so might a much wider war.

We could have avoided all this if Trump had not torn up the deal we had in place in Trump 1.0.

Expand full comment
Erich Almasy's avatar

The law of unintended consequences will raise its ugly head again. 9/11 was a shock and the popular response of war in Iraq and Afghanistan (even though the suicide bombers were largely Saudi) meant economic disruption and trillions of dollars wasted. Like the Vietnam war it led to inflation and self-recrimination. Presidents like to start foreign conflicts when they want to distract the public. Wilson and México, Reagan and Grenada, H W Bush and Iraq, Clinton and the Balkans. Trump will definitely attack Iran and the ill will that generates could see Pakistan transfer an Islamic Bomb to Iran. Who needs enrichment when you have fanatical friends?

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts