Boston Massacre
I know, I know.
The Boston Massacre was in 1770, not 1970. A typo. We have made heroes out of the people in the crowd, but from the point of view of the British they were a dangerous mob. The British fired into them.
The event helps make my point about the difficulty of government controlling mass protests. When there are enough people involved, it doesn’t come across as a police issue dealing with a one-off criminal. It pits “the people” against “the government.” Shooting the half dozen people in the crowd quelled the disturbance momentarily, but it did not succeed in intimidating Bostonians into quiet acceptance of British rule. It led to greater unrest. That led to the Tea Party. Militia groups formed and began storing arms. Then the British effort to find those arms in Lexington and Concord. Paul Revere rode his horse to warn them. George Washington came to the Cambridge Common to take command of the militia.
Open armed rebellion.
I have been critical of Portland’s effort to quell the violence that took place under the cover and distraction of peaceful Black Lives Matter protests in Portland in 2020. Oregon officials didn’t do enough, in my opinion to stop vandalism and arson. There is a reason for that. It isn’t easy and it can backfire.